(If you don’t want to read this whole spiel, go down to the
bottom for a quick summary of my opinion)
England in the 1520s
is a heartbeat from disaster. If the king dies without a male heir, the country
could be destroyed by civil war. Henry VIII wants to annul his marriage of
twenty years and marry Anne Boleyn. The pope and most of Europe oppose him.
Into this impasse steps Thomas Cromwell: a wholly original man, a charmer and a
bully, both idealist and opportunist, astute in reading people, and implacable
in his ambition. But Henry is volatile: one day tender, one day murderous.
Cromwell helps him break the opposition, but what will be the price of his triumph?
This is supposed to be a great
book. It won awards for how good it was, in fact—the 2009 Booker Prize, the
National Book Critics Circle Award for Fiction, and to top it off a New York
Times Best Seller. It’s been critically acclaimed and praised as “a darkly
brilliant reimagining of life under Henry VIII…Magnificent,” by the Boston
Globe.
I hate this book.
I have no idea why I would hate a book that everyone else
seems to love, but I do. As you can read in the summary, it’s about the life
and reign of Henry VIII told through the eyes of his right-hand man, Thomas
Cromwell. It’s the first in a trilogy, with the second book in that series
already in the library (Bring Up the
Bodies, which deserves props if only for excellent title choice), and pretty
much every critic who’s ever read it eats it up. Except me, of course
Now, I know this is not because of the subject matter. While
it may have become obvious by now I’m much more of a fantasy/sci-fi girl, I do
like historical pieces and find Henry VIII a fascinating subject. In fact, The Other Boleyn Girl counts as one of
my favorite books, and it covers pretty much the same time period that Wolf Hall does!
It didn’t take too long to figure out why I despised this
book so much—the writing style is the end-all be-all for this particular piece,
and it certainly didn’t live up to the glowing expectations the reviews set for
me. The writing is tedious and exceptionally confusing, preventing me from even
attempting to relate to Thomas Cromwell and his exploits through the book.
Oftentimes instead of actually saying who is saying or doing what Ms. Mantel
will just say ‘he’, which constantly kept pulling me out of the story in an
attempt to figure out what the heck was going on.
Another strike against Wolf
Hall is that it endlessly, incredibly boring. This is supposed to be about
one of the most political and dangerous times in history, with the protestant
reformation occurring, the first divorce of a queen and the emergence of the
Church of England, and yet I found myself yawning the entire way through.
Thomas Cromwell was just not that engaging of a character—in fact, I found him
extremely unlikeable (when I could figure out what he was doing, that is). I literally suffered through reading this
cover to cover (I hope you’re happy).
Basically, I understand that some people, somewhere, really like this book. There’s a reason
why it got a ton of awards and great reviews. I just couldn’t see it. If you
want to give this book a try, go ahead, but if you can’t get too far than just
stop—it’ll save you a headache. I give this a zero out of ten.
Tl;dr: A confusing
writing style, boring portrayal of what is supposed to be an interesting time
period, and tedious dialogue kept me from seeing what all the fuss is about.

No comments:
Post a Comment